Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

If you have disabled Java for your browser, use the Site Map (linked in the header and footer).

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 

 

The Fascinating
Réti Gambit
Reviewed by Rick Kennedy

by Thomas Johansson

Lulu, 2006

ISBN: 1411692403

softcover, 228 pages

figurine algebraic notation


It is a good bet that Chessville readers are familiar with Thomas Johansson.  He is the author of The King's Gambit for the Creative Aggressor (Schachverlag Kania, 1998, reprinted 2001), a favorite among club players, which was positively reviewed on this site by Tom Codispodi, who caught the essence of the author's efforts:

You can hear the passion in his voice, and he comes across as someone who has fun playing this opening and who wants to make sure you get the same kind of enjoyment from it.

Johansson's follow-up, The Fascinating King's Gambit (Trafford, 2004), was again well received, catching IM John Watson's attention ("everything you need to know how to play 1.e4 e5 2.f4…"), tantalizing GM Jonathan Rowson ("it's clearly a labour of love, and that usually makes for pleasant reading and careful analysis") and causing GM Nigel Davies to muse about it: "Does fascinating help us win our games? …I think fascination helps with immersion but not mastery, and it's the mastery that helps us win."

Mastery, as Davies would no doubt agree, comes from doing the necessary hard work with the right materials - and Johansson's dynamic duo of King's Gambit books fill the bill for those of us less-than-Masters.

So now the Swedish swashbuckler shares with us another opening that he has fallen in love with, The Fascinating Réti Gambit.  Perhaps to forestall puzzled looks – Richard Réti the Hypermodern, as a NeoRomantic Gambiteer!? – Johansson has subtitled his book 1.e4 e6 2.b3!? A Fun Anti-French!

Listen to the book's siren call:

Are you one of those e4-players who absolutely hate to face the French Defence?  And when it occurs, do you get the feeling that black has all the fun, whether he's pressuring your d-pawn, breaking down your pawn centre, rounding up your a-pawn or boring you to tears with the Rubinstein?

Even those club players who relish their own secret recipes against the "King Pawn one square" defense - say, the tasty Winkelmann-Reimer Gambit, 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 Bb4 4.a3 Bxc3+ 5.bxc3 dxe4 6.f3 or the spicy Wing Gambit 1.e4 e6 2.Nf3 d5 3.e5 c5 4.b4 - may wish to try some of Johansson's home cooking.

After 1.e4 e6 2.b3, Black's most natural response is 2…d5, which White can “ignore” with 3.Bb2.  If Black grabs the pawn with 3…dxe4, White again develops with 4.Nc3.

Should the defender try to hang onto his pawn with 4…f5, given as the Gurevich Variation, Johansson shows in Section 1 of his book that 5.f3 leads to a lively game. Of course, 5…ef?! 6.Nxf3 gives White what he wants (a lead in development and a backwards pawn target at e6).








Black can instead counterattack with 5…Bd6, which leads to a wild game, as analysis by Johansson, GM Gurevich and Fritz9 shows.  Section 2 covers the more sedate alternative for attacking the advanced black e-pawn, 5.d3, a idea from Tartakower.  Johansson adds his own recommendation, 5.Qe2.  All three approaches for White give him compensation for his pawn, and chances for at least an edge – if not more than that.

Sections 3 - 13 focus on play after Black decides to protect the advanced e-pawn with a Knight (instead of a pawn) - 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 de 4.Nc3 Nf6 - to which White responds with Réti's 5.Qe2 (from Réti - Maroczy, Gothenburg 1920):








Johansson outlines a number of defenses:
     5…Nbd7 Müller Defence;
     5…Be7 Maroczy Defense;
     5…Nc6 Timman Defense;
     5…Bd7 (with the idea of 6…Bc6) Fort Knoxville;
     5…c5 Renman Defense;
     5…Qd4 a là Englund;
     5…b6;
     5…Bc5; and
     5…Bd6.

He also puts a lot of energy into 5…Bb4 6.0-0-0 and Black's various responses.  The author consistently shows the relevant games (old as well as current, including his own), analyzes with the help of his silicon friend, is familiar with the relevant French Defense literature (including Harding, Keres, Minev, Psakhis, Schwarz, Suetin and Watson) and has suggestion for both sides.  He notes:

…The following lines illustrates an important point of the Réti Gambit - choice!  Both sides have a lot of natural moves to choose from during the first 10 - 15 moves and most of these are similarly motivated and thus it can be hard to separate wheats from oats.  The one who has the better grasp of what to do is usually victorious.  The icing on the cake is that even if white should make a wrong decision, he usually gets a second (or even third!) chance to turn the game around, while black's margin of error is often not as wide, especially over the board.

White's main ideas revolve around if/when to capture the pawn at e4, which side to castle (usually Queenside), and how to use g2-g4 to undermine Black’s center and start an attack on his King.

Here’s a taste of Johansson’s work:

This is a very tricky position to evaluate, and it’s no wonder both Grandmasters err in the following moves.








a) 18.f4?!  Even fritz shows his human side, the following is his main line at 17 ply in.  The bait at h7 is enough to make him blunder!  18…Nb4 19.a4? b5 20.Nc3 (20.g6 bxa4! 21.gxh7 axb3) 20…bxa4! 21.Qe4? Bc6 22.Qxh7 axb3 -+;

b) 18.g6!! seems to be the clearest solution, proving at least a very clear advantage for white.  18…fxg6 19.Nhg5 Rxh1 20.Rxh1 Nb4 21.a4 Nc6 (21…b5?? 22.Rh7!! bxa4 23.Rxe7 + - (ΔNd6+)) 22.Nf7! (22.Rh7!?) 22…Nxe5 23.Ned6+ Bxd6 24.Nxd6+ Kb8 25.Qxe5 is incredibly awkward for black.  White is probably winning due to the cornered king, weak 8th rank and a possible Rh7 pinning Bd7, should black respond 25…Qc7.;

c) 18.Nf4!? is a more human move, shuffling the inactive knight into the middle, e.g.: 18…Nb4 (or 18.Rxh1 19.Rxh1 Nb4 20.a4 transposing to the text) 19.a4 Rxh1 20.Rxh1 b5? (better is 20…Bc6 21.Rh7 c4 23.Nc3 +).  However now white needs some ‘brute force’ accuracy!  21.Rh7!! + -  bxa4 22.Ng6! and suddenly white is the one with the ‘fastest and mostest men’ around the enemy king!  22…fxg6 (22…axb3 23.Nxe7+ Kb7 24.Nd6+ Ka8 25.Qe4+ Bc6 26.Nxc6 +- ) Rxe7 Kb7 24.Qc4! axb3 25.Nxc5+ Ka8 26.Nxb3+-  Black’s king is too naked to survive without further material losses (Δ26…Qxe5 27.Rxd7);

d) 18.Qg4?! c4 19.Rhe1 Bc6? (19…Nb4 20.Nc3 Nc6 =) 20.Nf4! Nb4 21.Nc3+ Nxa2!?/?!  Black is under a lot of pressure anyway, so he takes the chance to change the pace of the game.  Over the board that is probably the best defense though objectively it’s losing.  22.Nxa2 cxb3 23.cxb3 Rxd2 24.Rxd2 (24.Nc1! is winning according to my little German friend.  But the move Réti chose, isn’t bad either.)  24...Qxd2 25.Qe2 Qxe2 26.Nxe2 Bxg5 27.Nd4 Rh1 28.Rxh1 Bxh1 29.Nb5 f6 30.Nxa7+ Kd7 31.Bd4 e5 32.Bb6 f5 33.Nc3 f4 34.Kc2 e4 35.Bd4 Bh4 36.Kd2! is the right move, keeping d1 open for the knight: (36.Kd1? e3! 37.fxe3 f3 38.e4 (38.Ne4 f2 39.Nd2 Bf3+ 40.Kc2 Be2)  38…Bg2 39.Nab5 f2 40.Bxf2 Bxf2 41.Ke2 Bc5 ½ - ½ Reti, R - Maroczy, G, Gothenburg 1920) 36…Bg2 (36…e3+ 37.fxe3 f3 38.e4 Bg2 39.Nd1 +-) 37.Ke2 and white should be winning eventually.

After this excerpt, Chessville readers should be closer to being able to decide if The Fascinating Réti Gambit is for them or not.  One group that should probably “pass” on the book is those who want to be told which one line to play in an opening, and not be distracted by other alternatives, however interesting!

Sections 14 through 18 cover the Papa Gambit, 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 d3 4.Nc3 Nf6 5.g4, named after Mike Papa, Jr., who wrote a booklet on the line in 1991.








Johansson is not as sure of playing the thematic g-pawn move this early as he is of 5.Qe2, because it is less flexible, but he throws himself into the line with his usual vigor.  There is certainly a lot to evaluate: How dangerous is the threat of g4-g5?  Should Black stop the move with 5…h7-h6 or focus on development with moves like 5…Bd7 (∆ 6…Bc6), 5…Nc6, 5…Bb4, or 5…Be7?  While it may be helpful to use Papa’s booklet as a secondary resource, these five sections are comprehensive – like the old television commercial about spaghetti sauce, “It’s in there!”  Johansson’s assessment is that "White seems to reach a playable position here I think, but it’s a narrow path and there may be unforeseen snags."

But, let’s say the “frenchies” (as Johansson refers to those who answer 1.e4 with 1…e6) don’t really want the white e-pawn after all, and play something sly like 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 Nf6.  What is White to do then?








While most books look at either 4.exd5 exd5 5.Nf3 (or 5.Qe2) and 4.e5 Nfd7 5.f4 c5 6.Nf3, both lines go nowhere in Johansson’s opinion, and he offers Papa’s less-explored 4.e5 Nfd7 5.Qg4 c5 6.f4 Nc6 7.Nf3 as a place to look:








Play is much more strategic compared to that after 3…de, akin to the lines of an unusual Advance French (1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.e5) and the author takes the time to point out the important questions for White, e.g. where do the pieces go, and where does the King go when he castles?  As always, he is frank about what is happening:

This position is almost mandatory in my experience.  In this and the following sections we’ll look into black’s different 7th moves and the different setups they represent.  I may well have overlooked some transpositions between them, but in these positions move orders are not terribly important, so I choose to avoid confusing the reader – and myself and concentrate on game examples instead of long theory lines for a change.  So, use the following sections [19-25] to build up an understanding of what is going on, and don’t be put off by the number of early inaccuracies from both sides – everybody is still making it up as they go along!

Section 26 covers the alternate retreat 4…Ng8, which is not promising for Black.

Tactical maniacs will be able to use this portion of The Fascinating Réti Gambit to learn about “the structural and developmental prerequisites for an attack” (ok, I made that phrase up myself) – kind of like eating your veggies along with the meat and potatoes.  If they feel at all unhappy about this, they should blame it on the frenchies, not the Swede!  In each and every line the author strives to deliver at least a “+/=”.  (By the way, Johansson mentions an alternative gambit, 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 Nf6 4.d3!? de 5.Nd2 exd3 6.Bxd3 but he makes no promises.)

The second player can also take the game into Sicilian waters with 1.e4 e6 2.b3 c5 or 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bb2 c5:








This idea had been explored earlier in Robert Snyder’s 1984 Sicilian 2.b3 (Snyder Sicilian) – devotés of that opening variation will find enough new games, analysis and suggestions to make The Fascinating Réti Gambit [sections 27-29, 32-35] worth acquiring.

White may wind up answering …d7-d5 with exd, playing Bb5, playing c2-c4, playing d2-d4, or even f2-f4 depending upon Black’s setup (a move-order Index at the back of the book is very helpful in this regard).

Coverage is not as deep as in the main lines of the Réti Gambit (the book has only 228 pages!), but it will give players enough moves, structures and plans to get started and find their way through most of what they will meet over-the-board.  After all, most players answer 1.e4 with 1…e6 intending to play the French Defense, not the Sicilian.  (Note to self: if 1.e4 e6 2.b3 c5 is uncomfortable, find something other than 2.b3 to play against 1.e5 c5)

What’s left? How about 1.e4 e6 2.b3 d5 3.Bg2 d4 or 3…Nc6, 3…a6 3…Nd7.  While rare, none of them are unpalatable for Black, so Johansson gives ways to meet each in section 31.  In the last section, he addresses 1.e4 e6 2.b3 Be7, 2…Qf6, 2…e5, and 2…Nf6.

What should Black do when faced with the Réti Gambit?  What’s the “best” response of all those available to him?  (He should get The Fascinating Réti Gambit.  And study it, of course!)  French Defender IM John Watson recommends that Black meet 1.e4 e6 2.b3 with 2…b6, Owen’s Defence, (possibly transposing later, with …c7-c5, to a sideline of the Sicilian, or with …d7-d5 to the French again).  Johansson is impressed –  “I advise you to study this section carefully, to avoid some quick and painful losses.

The author squeezes the regular Réti setup of pieces and pawns for whatever he can get out of it (not a whole lot) and then opines that 3.d4 may be “the Achilles heel of the 2…b6 move order.”  There is plenty of room for experimentation, and this section of the book is tantalizingly short, but the general idea is to seek out positions where b2-b3 is more advantageous (or less disadvantageous) for White than b7-b6 is for Black.

Chances are that if you take up the Réti Gambit, many of your opponents (if you are below master level) will be totally unfamiliar with it, much to your advantage.  A while back Tim McGrew, in his “Gambit Cartel” column for Chess Café, wrote an article on the opening entitled Terra Incognita, that is, “unknown territory.”  He tried an “experiment” – without studying or even playing over any complete games, he tried 1.e4 e6 2.b3 to “see whether just by disorienting my opponents I could achieve interesting and playable positions.”  He was quite happy with his results.  Imagine how well he would have done had he known the details of the opening…

At the same site at a different time, Nigel Davies presented an annotated Réti Gambit game, noting at one point “This is all very exciting but it’s not very impressive if Black plays sensibly.”  A fair warning – but one that is applicable to every opening (including my beloved Jerome Gambit).  White’s edge comes from surprise & novelty – as well as a better understanding of what should be played where and when in a dynamic opening setup.  Until all that wisdom can be bottled as a skin lotion, and simply rubbed onto the forehead before a game, even fascinating chess openings will require some of that infamous 4-letter word: work.

The Fascinating Réti Gambit is published by Lulu, a print-on-demand publisher, which means that the author did all of the manuscript preparation, layout, editing, etc. himself.  That is a lot of long, hard and tedious work.  (Anyone who doubts this has never done it.)  Yet the layout and use of white space, diagrams, fonts, bolding, and the occasional underlining make the book very readable – and I recall finding only one typo, which is rather amazing.  The Index, as noted, is very helpful, and the list of Sources (i.e. Bibliography – yay!), inclusive.

For the adventurous soul (club player to master) who is a bit tired of the “same old, same old” lines played against the French Defense, I can recommend Thomas Johansson’s book wholeheartedly.

Oh, and The Fascinating Réti Gambit ends with a request by Johansson:

By the way, feel free to drop me a line at tjmisha@passagen.se just to show off some brilliant wins or ask about some new move you’ve encountered and so on.



Index of all Reviews


Chess Books & Equipment

 

search tips

The
Chessville
Chess Store


Reference
Center


The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

Home          About Us          Contact Us          Newsletter Sign-Up          Site Map

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2008 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.