Chessville - by chessplayers, for chessplayers!
 

Chess Praxis
by Aron Nimzowitsch

new translation by Ian Adams

Reviewed by Rick Kennedy

Quality Chess, 2007
ISBN:  978-9185779000
softcover, 224 pages
figurine algebraic notation


I forget how much fun Nimzowitsch is.

Aron Nimzowitsch (1886 - 1935) was arguably one of the top half-dozen chess players in the world from the mid-1920s to the mid-1930s, taking first or second place in a string of tournaments, including: Copenhagen 1923, Marienbad 1925, Dresden 1926, Hannover 1926, Carlsbad 1929, and San Remo 1930.

He was one of the leading voices in the “hypermodern” school of chess, which challenged various accepted strategic notions of chess play (e.g. the center can only be controlled by occupying it with pawns), as personified in the works and games of  Siegbert Tarrasch (whom Nimzowitsch came to see as a personal nemesis).

He introduced a bevy of strategic and positional concepts such as centralization, restriction & blockade, over-protection & prophylaxis, the problem of the isolated pawn, the weakness of same-color-square-complexes and the “triumph of the ‘ugly’ move.”

Nimzowitsch wrote My System (1925 - 27) and Blockade (1925), outlining his strategic thoughts. Chess Praxis (1929), a collection of his best games, illustrates those ideas in action.

It is hard to find a modern grandmaster who has not been influenced by Nimzowitsch’s works.  Many strong players recommend an understanding of Nimzowitsch as essential to chess progress.  Various modern openings, as exemplified by the Nimzo-Larsen Attack (1.b3), the Nimzowitch Defense (1.e4 Nc6) and most especially the Nimzo-Indian Defense (1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 e6 3.Nc3 Bb4), continue to reflect his ideas.

Chess Praxis, according to the author,

...sets out to teach positional play: I shall explain lovingly and in depth (by means of articles scattered throughout the book) the stratagems which were hinted at in my maiden work and then they will be illustrated by games.  And yet the book is quite independent of My System, since nowhere is it presupposed that the reader has any knowledge of the principles of the said system.

There follow 109 of Nimzowitsch’s games, many against the top masters of the day, annotated in evocative style.  It is easy to feel the author’s excitement for his ideas and his play, as well as his concern and occasional disdain for those who do not appreciate them.

Thus, after the opening moves of Vajda - Nimzowitsch, Kecskemét 1927, 1.e4 Nc6 2.d4 d5 3.Nc3 e6 4.e5 Nge7 5.Nf3 b6 6.Ne2, he writes:

As a somewhat melancholy author once said “They both indulged in monologues each pausing for the other to speak, and they thought they were having a dialogue.”  This is also the case here: Black is trying to seize the white squares and White is trying to occupy the black ones –  he is planning Ne2-g3-h5 with pressure against g7 and f6.  The only thing the two players have in common is that they are taking turns to move.

The main chapters are “Centralization,” “Restriction and Blockade,” “Overprotection and other forms of Prophylaxis,” “The Isolated Queen’s Pawn, the two Hanging Pawns – the two Bishops,” “Manoeuvering against opposing weaknesses,” and “A brief survey of hypermodern territory – old and new.”  If you’ve been working on your positional chess, chances are these topics are relevant to you.

Chess Praxis also includes an index of games, an index of stratagems and an index of openings, as well as an Introduction.  In addition, Quality Chess has added a small Postscript containing ten examples of modern improvements over Nimzowitsch’s analysis – tucked in the back of the book, and referred to by superscript in the original text.

Here is an excerpt from Chess Praxis’ coverage of Yates - Nimzowitsch, London 1927, a prize-winning game from the British Empire Club Masters Tournament, in which Nimzowitsch finished first ahead of Tartakower, Marshall, Vidmar, Bogoljubov, Reti and Colle, among others.

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 Nf6

 

My new move from San Sebastian [Schlechter – Nimzowitsch, San Sebastian 1912].

 

3.e5 Nd5 4.Bc4 Nb6 5.Bd2 Nc6

 

White has lost two tempi with the bishop, but on the other hand the knight is not so well placed on b6, so the bishop manoeuvre should not be criticized.

 

6.c3 d5 7.d4

 

He should have preferred 7.exd6

 

7…cxd4 8.cxd4 Bf5 9.0-0 e6 10.Nc3 Be7

 








 

11.Ne1

 

Should the planned attack with f4 and then g4 and f5 really turn out to be possible, this would constitute proof that 8…Bf5 was wrong, and that would be nonsense. But in reality, nothing special is achieved after 11.Ne1 and this diversion should have been replaced by a properly thought out plan down the c-file, e.g. 11.be3 0-0 12.Rc1 followed by a3 and b4, then Nf3-d2-b3-c5, and the sort of outpost recommended in My System is achieved.

 

11…Nd7! 12.Bg4!

 

Ingenious play! After 12.f4? there would have followed 12…Nxd4 13.Qxd4?? Bc5. Another unfavourable move would be 12.Bd3 on account of 12…Ndxe5 13.dxe5 d4 14.Bc2 dxc3 15.Bxc3 Qc7 with something of a positional advantage for Black. With the help of the text move (12.Bg4) Yates makes possible f4 which he had been aiming for in a totally surprising way!

 

12…Bg6 13.f4 Nxd4 14.Nxd5! Nc6!

 

14…Bc5 was met by the strong 15.b4; 14…exd5 would be quite bad on account of 15.Bxd7+ and then 16.Qxd4.

 

15.Nxe7 Qb6+ 16.Kh1 Nxe7








17.Qa4

 

Here we have just the sort of typical mistake mentioned in our preliminary notes!  Obviously Black is planning to occupy the central squares, and naturally White would contest this, instead of simply avoiding it by means of 17.Qa4. so 17.Qe2! (intending Be3) 17…Nd5 18.Bf3 Qc5 19.Bd2 N7b6 20.Rc1 Qe7 and now possibly 21.Be3 leaving White with “more” of the centre than Black.  But even if he had not achieved that “more”, so what!  He still had to fight!  But now his deserved punishment is not long in coming.

And Nimzowitch won in 40 moves.

The Quality Chess edition of Chess Praxis is at least the fifth version available to readers in English – yet there is a very good reason for this.

Still available in used books shops or online, for about $5, is the Dover 1962 edition that many of us oldsters grew up with – presented in the out-dated English descriptive notation and based on the 1936 translation from German to English by J. Du Mont.

In 1986, Batsford reprinted the book, and in 1994, so did Hardinge Simpole – using the same translation and the same notation.  I don’t know how easily the Bastsford version can be found, but HS’s is available for around $35 - $40, new, or around $25 - $30, used.  Steep.

Then there is the Hays Publishing 1993 “21st century” edition (new from $15 to $20, used for $10 or so), using the Du Mont translation, but updating the games to algebraic notation.  For players who weren’t born a half-century (or more) ago, that’s a step up.

It is interesting to note, however, that when it comes to the 75-year old Du Mont translation of Chess Praxis, not everyone is charitable in their assessment.  GM Raymond Keene wrote in his Aron Nimzowitsch: A Reappraisal:

The English of My System is, by and large, very good and makes a brave effort to capture the spirit of Nimzowitsch’s original German, but, unfortunately, the same cannot be said of the translation of Chess Praxis which I find a poor, maimed torso of Nimzowitsch’s original.  If you have no alternative read the translation by all means, but if you possess the merest smattering of German I urge you to read the original.  It is well worth the effort.

Even though I do possess “the merest smattering of German” (and profess to speak French like a Spanish cow, to boot) I’m not ready to fully characterize Du Mont’s effort as a “poor, maimed torso” (see Jeremy Silman’s review, for some more balance in the comparison) – based upon my reading of the Dover edition, and comparing it to the Quality Chess edition.  Still, thanks to Du Mont, I know the meaning of such words as “irruption” and “nugatory,” and thanks to Quality Chess, I now don’t have to guess as much about what Nimzowitsch was actually thinking…

Thus, the current version of Chess Praxis, with a new, modern translation by Ian Adams; with figurine algebraic notation; and with lots of diagrams, to boot!

What I particularly like about Adams’ translation for Quality Chess is that often he seems to include more in how he renders Nimzowitsch’s words.  Let me give an example:

In the Du Mont translation, “the ‘elastic’ treatment of the openings,”

...becomes in the Adams translationthe flexible handling of the opening

This stratagem, introduced at the time by the author, was looked upon as a product of decadence.  For example, and amateur who played a weak enough game to enable him to conduct an important chess-column, maintained that to mask one’s intentions in the opening showed a lack of pluck!

When your author introduced this stratagem it was hailed as decadent by the smart-alecks of the Tarrasch era.  For example, Therkatz, and amateur who played weakly enough to be able to write quite an  important chess column, claimed that hiding your opening plans showed a “lack of moral fibre.”

Perhaps in Du Mont’s time, it wasn’t considered proper to name names.  In any event, I noticed a number of times that Adams’ translations were more robust than Du Mont’s.

Quality Chess’ layout of Chess Praxis is clean and readable, with double columns, good use of fonts, bolding and white space – plus those extra diagrams that I mentioned earlier are great.  I found a few notation errors apparently resulting from the translation of moves from English Descriptive notation to algebraic (something that shouldn’t happen with the availability of chess software), but they weren’t problematic.

If you’ve never read (and played through!) Nimzowitsch’s classic Chess Praxis, it’s time to do so.  If you have, but it’s been a while, it’s time to turn that battered old Dover copy over to a used book shop, and grab hold of the new and improved version.

(As a final note, it is important to grasp that Nimzowitsch was not just a strategist.  A club player can copy the often baroque and “ugly” style of play showcased in Chess Praxis, but he or she should be prepared to suffer immeasurably without the master’s necessary accompanying tactical skill.  Nimzowitsch’s games must be studied with the underlying tactics in mind, as well – they are the rebar of his strategic masterpieces.  This is the only caveat to accompany my recommendation.)


From the Publisher's website:
  Aron Nimzowitsch was one of the greatest chess players of the 1920s and 1930s, ranked just behind the famous World Champions Alekhine and Capablanca. His reputation as an author is higher still.  PDF excerpt.

Index
of all
Reviews


Chess Books
& Equipment

 

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 

Follow Chessville1 on Twitter
 


Ranked #1 by Google
"largest chess database''




The
Chessville
Chess Store


The
Chessville
Weekly

Newsletter

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives

 

Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each


 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2009 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.