Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 

Already
Play the
Colle System?

Learn to Play it Better!

The Moment of Zuke:
Critical Positions and
Pivotal Decisions for
Colle System Players

by David Rudel
author of Zuke 'Em

7 modules written just for Colle System Players.  Over 150 practice problems accompany lessons written in Rudel's crystal-clear, inimitable style

Thematic Lessons
on game-changing
decisions Colle Players
frequently face

Two Free
Excerpts
Available


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 

 

The Best of Chess Informant:
Garry Kasparov
(CD)

Reviewed by Prof. Nagesh Havanur

Chess Informant, 2006

ISSN: 1451 -9399

Chess Informant has hit a jackpot with this CD.  What can be more enticing than a terrific collection of annotated Kasparov games for an avid chess fan?  Carping critics would complain that the entire CD is no more than an assembly line job as the main database consists of 1193 games published by the Chess Informant itself over the years.  But if one takes into account the fact that at least half of the games were published in the pre-computer era, conversion of the published matter over a span of nearly three decades (1976-2005) into electronic data has been no mean task.

The CD opens with a preface by Kasparov himself in which he pays a handsome tribute to the Publishers, “We are all children of The Informant.”

This is followed by the biographical record with match & tournament cross-tables.  There is at least one glaring omission here.  Kasparov participated in the World Blitz Championship, St. John 1988.  This was a star-studded field with 32 players including Kasparov, Karpov, Vaganian and Tal, the eventual winner.  Kasparov was eliminated in the third round by Kiril Georgiev of Bulgaria with the score 1-3.

There is a reason for this omission.  In the earlier years it was a practice for the Informant to cover only FIDE -rated events.  Consequently, rapid and blitz tournaments were left out of Informant issues.

It is only in the last two decades this policy has changed and events like the Melody Amber are covered in the Informant.  Incidentally, Melody Amber is the only prestigious event in which Kasparov has not participated.

The Close-up section has a lovely collection of images, mainly associated with world championship matches.

As for the main database, 595 out of 1193 games are annotated by Kasparov himself.  The rest are no less interesting as most of them are annotated by his rivals: Kramnik, Karpov, Anand, Shirov and others.

While Kasparov himself has selected 13 Best Games of his career, there is a separate set of 100 Best Games chosen by the Informant Jury over the years.

Similarly there is a massive collection of 123 theoretical novelties (TN) ranging from the Ruy Lopez to the Reti Opening.  Besides, there are four major Theoretical Surveys of English Attack (B80), Scotch Game(C45), Catalan Opening ( E04), and the King's Indian Defence(E92), outlining Kasparov's contribution to these systems.

There is also an audio commentary by Kasparov on the 16th Game of the World Championship Match 1985 against Karpov.

The Section "Play Like Kasparov" has quiz positions based on standard ideas like combinations, attack, defence and endings.  There is also a novel theme, Rare blunders & Misconceptions.  There are as many as 34 positions in which Kasparov has committed oversights or misjudged the position.  These positions show that even Kasparov is human.

What can one say about the games?  They are fabulous.  As for the annotations, there is a certain degree of difference between the annotations of the games in the pre-computer era and what followed thereafter.  As Kasparov himself would acknowledge, the evaluation of earlier games is bound to change on account of computer analysis.  It is to his credit that most of his annotations are vindicated by the silicon friend.

A case in point is the following game.  Along with Kasparov's notes, I have made grateful use of the excellent commentary on the same by Jacob Aagaard in his book Starting Out: The Grũnfeld (Everyman Chess, 2004.)
 

Beliavsky - Kasparov [E00]
Belfort World Cup 1988

1.d4 Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5

The Grũnfeld Defence.

4.Nf3 Bg7 5.Qb3 dxc4 6.Qxc4 0–0 7.e4








The Russian System was the main choice of players such as Botvinnik and Smyslov in the 1950s.  In the 1980s it became a battle ground in the Karpov-Kasparov matches.

7...Na6

The Prins Variation.  Other alternatives are 7...a6 (the Hungarian Variation) and 7...Bg4 (the Smyslov Variation.)

8.Be2 c5 9.d5 e6 10.Bg5

10.0-0 exd5 cxd5 is more usual.

10...exd5 11.Nxd5

"Capturing with the knight is the main point behind 10.Bg5." - Aagaard

11...Be6 12.0–0–0!?








Beliavsky is known for his uncompromising play.  But I think 12.Rd1 preserving the option of 0-0 is safer and better.

The game Sosonko-Kalinin, USSR 1967 went13. Bd2 Bxd5 14.exd5 Qb6 15.Bc3χ with an unclear position.

This line needs more tests.-NSH

12...Bxd5 13.Rxd5 Qb6 14.Bxf6 Qxf6 15.e5 Qf5!

Tempting White to put his bishop on d3 -Aagaard.

16.Bd3

16.Rhd1? Bh6+! 17.Nd2 Nb4 with the evil threat of 18...b5.-Aagaard.

16...Qc8

Kasparov recommends 16...Qe6!? 17.Rd6 Qe7χ with an unclear position.

17.Rd1?








This 'routine' development move has a tactical flaw in that it ignores the precarious position of the rook on d5.

White should have played17.Rd6! b5 18.Qh4 (18.Qxb5 Nb4 19.Qc4 Nxd3+ 20.Rxd3 Rb8 21.a3 Rb6) 18...c4 19.Be4 Nc5 20.Bxa8 Nd3+ 21.Kb1 Qxa8 22.Rd1 Now Black should not continue 22...Nxe5 23.Nxe5 Bxe5 24.R6d5± (24.Rd8? Qxg2).  Instead he should play 22...Qc8 23.R6xd3 (23.Qd4? Nxe5! 24.Nxe5 Qf5+) 23...cxd3 24.Rxd3 Qf5.

17...b5!

Black has the upper hand.

18.Qh4

Not 18.Qxb5? Nc7 winning the exchange.

18...Nb4 19.Bxg6?!








Like the ancient Roman, Beliavsky throws himself on his sword.

Here Kasparov gives 19.Rd6 c4 20.Be4 c3! 21.a3 c2 22.axb4 cxd1Q+ 23.Kxd1 Rb8

With the hindsight of computer analysis Aagaard points out that White has a drawing line here:  21.R1d4! cxb2+ 22.Kxb2 Qc5 23.a3 Rac8 24.axb4 Qc1+ 25.Ka2 Rc3 26.Ra6 It appears that Black has no way to strengthen his attack,and must give perpetual check with 26...Rc2+.

However, Kasparov's evaluation of the position is right.

''After 19...Nxa2 20.kb1 Nb4 Black's position still gives a good impression.''-Aagaard.

19...fxg6!

Not 19...hxg6?? 20.Ng5 Re8 21.Rd7+-

20.Rd7 Qe8!

Protecting the e6 square that White cannot swing the knight around.-Aagaard.

21.Re7

21.a3 Nc6 22.e6!? Rxf3!

22...Nd4!  Simply excluding the rook on d1 from the attack is also good.

White cannot overstep the mark with 23.Rxg7+ Kxg7 24.Rd7+ Qxd7 25.exd7 Rf6–+ - Aagaard.

21...Bh6+!








Creating a mating net around the White King.

22.Kb1 Rd8! 23.Rd6

Isn't Black lost?

Aagaard gives 23.Re1 Qc6! 24.Qxh6?Rd1+!! 25.Rxd1 Qe4+ 26.Ka1 Nc2+ 27.Kb1 Na3+ 28.Ka1 Qb1+ 29.Rxb1 Nc2# and modestly admits that it is computer analysis.

23...Qc6!! –+








A stunning move.

24.a3

24.Rxc6?? Rd1# #; 24.Qxh6?? Qe4+–+

24...Rxd6 25.exd6 Qxd6 26.axb4 cxb4 27.Qe4

Going down the heroic way.  Beliavsky would not play the demeaning 27.Re1.

27...b3 28.Nd4

Exchanging the queens brings no relief.

After 28.Qe6+ Qxe6 29.Rxe6 Rc8 White loses the game on the second rank.  - Aagaard.

28...Rf4 29.Qa8+ Bf8 0–1
 

The second game is one of the thirteen Best Games chosen by Kasparov himself.  Along with Kasparov's notes I have also offered the commentary on the game by Igor Stohl from his book Garry Kasparov's Greatest Chess Games Volume 2:

Garry Kasparov - Veselin Topalov [B07]
Wijk aan Zee 1999

1.e4 d6 2.d4 Nf6 3.Nc3 g6 4.Be3 Bg7

In his notes to the game in NIC Magazine (2/1999) Kasparov's second Yury Dokhoian admitted that the Pirc Defence came as a surprise to Garry as Topalov plays it rarely.

5.Qd2 c6 6.f3








Jansa prefers the sharper 6.Bh6 Bxh6 7.Qxh6 Qa5 8.Bd3 c5 9.Nge2 cxd4 10.Nxd4 Nc6 11.Nb3 Qb6 12.0–0 Be6 13.a4!? with unclear play.  The idea of the pawn sacrifice is to trap the Black King in the centre.  (Stohl)

6...b5 7.Nge2

This move appears slightly artificial . 7.0–0–0 Qa5 8.Kb1 Nbd7=; White has two promising alternatives in the solid 7.Bd3 ; and the aggressive 7.g4 (Stohl)

7...Nbd7 8.Bh6 Bxh6 9.Qxh6 Bb7

9...Qa5 10.Nc1

10.a3 e5








Topalov could have played the waiting game with the more flexible 10...Qc7!? and if White plays 11.0–0–0 Black responds with 11...a5.  (Stohl)

11.0–0–0 Qe7 12.Kb1 a6 13.Nc1 0–0–0 14.Nb3 exd4! 15.Rxd4 c5 16.Rd1 Nb6! 17.g3 Kb8 18.Na5 Ba8 19.Bh3 d5 20.Qf4+ Ka7 21.Rhe1 d4








Black should not open the centre with 21...dxe4 ? on account of 22.fxe4± Rhe8 (The game Golubovic-Reizniee, 1999 continued 22...Rxd1+ 23.Rxd1 b4? 24.Rd7+! 1–0 (Stohl)) 23.Nd5 with attack.

22.Nd5 Nbxd5 23.exd5 Qd6 24.Rxd4 !!








24...cxd4 ?

Accepting the challenge.  Later Kasparov said that when he went in for the rook sacrifice, he certainly took account of Veselin's uncompromising character, and of his readiness to compete in the calculation of variations and breadth of imagination.

Dokhoian points out that Garry was afraid of the imperturbable 24...Kb6 ! 25.Nb3 ! 25...Bxd5 ! (25...cxd4 ? 26.Qxd4+ Kc7 27.Qa7+ Bb7 28.Nc5 Rb8 29.Re7++- Qxe7 30.Nxa6+ Kd6 31.Qc5+) 26.Qxd6+ Rxd6 27.Rd2 Rhd8 28.Red1 a5=

25.Re7+ !

25.Qxd4+ ? 25...Qb6 26.Re7+ Nd7

25...Kb6

25...Kb8 26.Qxd4 ! 26...Nd7 27.Bxd7! Bxd5 28.c4 ! 28...Qxe7 29.Qb6+ Ka8 30.Qxa6+ Kb8 31.Qb6+ Ka8 32.Bc6+ ! 32...Bxc6 33.Nxc6+-.

Kasparov does not even bother to mention 25...Qxe7? 26.Qxd4+ Kb8 27.Qb6++-

26.Qxd4+ Kxa5 27.b4+ Ka4 28.Qc3








Kasparov states out that he missed a brilliant line here with 28.Ra7!  Stohl points out that it was Kavalek who came up with the idea.  28...Bb7 (28...Nxd5 29.Rxa6+ !! 29...Qxa6 30.Qb2 Nc3+ 31.Qxc3 Bd5 32.Kb2+-; 28...Bxd5 29.Qc3 Rhe8 30.Kb2 Re2 31.Qc7+- !) 29.Rxb7

Now Black has a choice of evils:

A)  29...Nxd5 30.Bd7 ! 30...Rxd7 (30...Ra8 31.Bxb5+ axb5 32.Ra7+ Qa6 33.Qxd5+- (Stohl)) 31.Qb2 Nxb4 (31...Nc3+ 32.Qxc3 Qd1+ 33.Ka2 Rd3 34.Ra7!+- (Stohl)) 32.Rxd7 Qc5 33.Rd4 Rc8 34.Qb3++-

B)  29...Rhe8 30.Bf1 again with the threat of Bxb5+ and Ra7 mate.  30...Re1+ 31.Kb2 Rxf1 32.Qc3 Rb1+ 33.Kxb1 Qxd5 34.Ra7 Rd6 35.Kb2+- (Stohl)

C)  29...Qxd5 30.Rb6! a5 (30...Ra8 31.Qxf6 a5 32.Bf1 Rhb8 33.Rd6+-) 31.Ra6 Ra8 32.Qe3 !! 32...Rxa6 33.Kb2 axb4 34.axb4 Qa2+ 35.Kxa2 Kxb4+ 36.Kb2 Rc6 37.Bf1 Ra8 38.Qe7+ Ka5 39.Qb7+-

28...Qxd5

28...Bxd5?? 29.Kb2+-

29.Ra7 !

Not 29.Qc7 ? 29...Qd1+

Or 29.Kb2? Qd4

29...Bb7 30.Rxb7!








White continues his attack a rook down.  Topalov had thought that Kasparov would reconcile himself to a draw with 30.Qc7 Qd1+ 31.Kb2 Qd4+

30...Qc4

Other alternatives also fail:

I.  30...Rd6 31.Rb6!! 31...Rxb6 32.Kb2+-

II.  30...Rhe8 ! 31.Rb6 Ra8 32.Bf1 !! (pointed out by Lighterink) 32...Re1+ ! (32...Nd7 33.Rd6 ! 33...Rec8 34.Qb2+-; 32...Re6 33.Rxe6 fxe6 34.Kb2+-) 33.Qxe1 Nd7 34.Rb7 !! 34...Qxb7 35.Qd1 ! 35...Kxa3 36.c3+-

IIII. 30...Ne4 ! 31.fxe4 Qc4 32.Ra7 !! 32...Rd1+ (32...Ra8 33.Qe3+-) 33.Kb2 Qxc3+ 34.Kxc3 Rd6 35.e5 Rb6 36.Kb2 Re8 37.Bg2 ! 37...Rd8(37...Rxe5 38.Bb7+- Kasparov's line stops here. If 38...Re7 39.Bd5!) 38.Bb7 Rd7 39.Bc6!! Rd8 (39...Rd2 40.Be8+-) 40.Bd7+-   Black is in zugzwang. 40...Rf8 41.c4! (Stohl)

31.Qxf6 Kxa3

The alternative 31...Rd1+ also loses. 32.Kb2 Ra8 33.Qb6 ! 33...Qd4+ (33...a5 34.Bd7+-) 34.Qxd4 Rxd4 35.Rxf7 a5 36.Be6 axb4 37.Bb3+ Ka5 38.axb4+ Kb6 (38...Rxb4 39.c3+- The rook is trapped!) 39.Rxh7 Rc8 40.h4+-

32.Qxa6+ Kxb4 33.c3+ ! 33...Kxc3 34.Qa1+ Kd2

34...Kb4 35.Qb2+ Ka5 36.Qa3+ Qa4 37.Ra7++-

35.Qb2+ Kd1 36.Bf1! Rd2








The only way to keep the squares c1,c2 and e2 protected.  Now for a moment it might seem that White's attack is over....(Stohl)

37.Rd7 ! Rxd7

37...Ke1? 38.Rxd2 and the bishop is taboo due to mate in one, 38...Kxf1 (38...Qxf1 39.Qc1 #) 39.Rd1# (Stohl)

38.Bxc4

White is threatening Qc1 # ! (Stohl)

38...bxc4

"It is amusing that, had the h8 rook been at g8, White's entire brilliant combination would not have worked...."  - Dokhoian.

39.Qxh8








Kasparov claims that he had seen this position in his mind's eye 15 moves earlier.

39...Rd3 40.Qa8 c3 41.Qa4+ Ke1 42.f4 f5 43.Kc1 Rd2 44.Qa7 1–0
 

The last example is based on the theme of rare blunders and misconceptions:

Alexie Shirov - Garry Kasparov
Novgorod 1994

(Annotations by Alexie Shirov)








1...Rc8??

Missing a win with 1...Bxb3 2.cxb3 Rd3 –+









Analysis Diagram: after 2...Rd3

2.Kb2! f6 3.gxf6 gxf6 4.Qd4 Qe5








Not 4...Qxc3+ 5.Qxc3 Rxc3 6.Kxc3 with active play as compensation for the pawn.

5.Qg1+ Qg5 6.Qb6 Qd5 7.Bg4!








7... Bxg4

Not 7...f5? 8.Bh5!

8.Qxf6 Qd79.Qh8+ Kf7 10.Qxh7+ Ke6 11.Qxe4+ Kf7!= 12.h7 Bf5








13.Qf4

Or 13.Qf3.  Now 13...Rxc3?! is dubious on account of 14.Qh5+ (But not 14.Kxc3? Qc7+ or 14.Qxc3? Bxh7) Bg6 15.h8N+! ±









Analysis Diagram: after 15.h8=N+

So Black should play 13....Qe6 as in the game.

13...Qe6 14.h8Q Rxh8 15.Bxh8 Qe4 16.Qc7+ ½–½









 

Highly Recommended.
 

Index of all Reviews

Click on the image to the right to purchase
this product at the Chessville Chess Store.

Chess Books
& Equipment

 


The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Reference
Center

 

The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2009 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.