|
Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints
Already
Play the
Colle System?Learn to Play it Better! |
The Moment of Zuke:
Critical Positions and
Pivotal Decisions for
Colle System Players |
|

by David Rudel
author of Zuke 'Em
|
|
7 modules written just for
Colle System Players. Over 150 practice problems accompany
lessons written in Rudel's crystal-clear, inimitable style |
|
Thematic Lessons
on game-changing
decisions Colle Players
frequently face
Two Free
Excerpts
Available
|
|

Advertise
with
Chessville!!
Advertise to
thousands
of
chess
fans
for
as little
as $25.
Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.

From the
Chessville
Chess Store



From the
Chessville
Chess Store
|
Ask the Tiger
with GM Nigel Davies

April 6th, 2003
Your chance to pick the brain of one of the world's leading GMs, chess
teachers, and authors!
Learn
more about Nigel's teaching philosophy and check out his very
reasonable rates. Visit his website,
Tiger Chess, loaded with instructional articles.
Ask the Tiger Your
Question Now!

------------------------
Q: I am about to play a big tournament here in the USA.
How do you prepare for a tournament technically and psychologically? With
kind regards, Diego
A: The main thing is keep a clear head and to keep concerns (both chess and
non-chess) to a minimum. Your technical preparation should be in keeping
with this and you should solve any specific worries that you have in the
opening.
-----------------------------
Q: I was at the recent Huddersfield chess tournament and was able also to
see you there. How do you prepare for these taxing 5 round tournaments, and
what advice could you give me for preparing? Thanks, Mark
A: If you're facing a tough schedule it certainly helps to stay in
reasonable shape. I go to the gym every day at 6am, keep coffee down to one
cup a day and try to get plenty of sleep.
-----------------------------
Q: I'm 54 and have a USCF rating of 1900. I'm been at this rating for
years. I play on ICC quite often so, it's not like I don't play enough.
What would you suggest I do to become an expert? Thanks Greg Sanford
A: The answer will vary from person to person and it may not be possible at
all. Playing a lot on the ICC is not necessarily a good thing as I guess
you're playing a lot of blitz.
-----------------------------
Q: Who were the players in this week's "Position of the Week"? A very
nice combination indeed... best regards Gabor Gyuricza (from Budapest)
A: I've got no idea. But you could try a position search in ChessBase!
-----------------------------
Q: What I need to understand from a GM is this: Your openings' choice
flow from your style of play. Goddem it! How to know the kind of player I
am? Is there some kind of tests? Don't tell me that I need a trainer
to see what is my style!
I end up with 1.c4 after years (around 15) playing 1.d4 because of the
quantity of theory behind it. With 1.c4 I can see my opponents less
comfortable, maybe because there is less books on this opening. Of course
1.c4 tends to transpose to 1.d4. I don't like to play against 1.d4 kind of
structure: I'm talking about the Slav and the King Indian type.
On the black side I opted for the Slav against 1.d4 but tried recently to
reply with 1...f5 for very slow play. Against 1.e4 I prefer the Pirc and try
sometimes the Counter Center with big deception. On other moves I play a
King Indian structure type.
Also, to help you to figure out who I am, I like Karpov's patience when
mobilizing his pieces and Petrosian's way to play the middlegame.
Kasparov's openings knowledge is too much to grasp for a 1800 elo player
like me.
Do you think you can see my style from what I'm playing in the openings
without seeing a single game of mine? Could you really help me?
Pierre from Canada
A: The way someone's personality is reflected in their chess is often quite
subtle; I don't think it's dictated by their choices of openings. It's
better to focus on playing good moves and making the best results that you
can. Your opening choices should be dictated by how well or badly you score
with them.
-----------------------------
Q: A friend and I have been playing one or two quick games a day at work
and I have written the last ten down, brought them and put them in chessbaselight
to analyze. I have noticed that being novices ( I have a uscf rating of
1300) we continually make the same tactical mistakes. I try to study at
least 30 minutes a day and read Chessville's wisdom section everyday but I
don't see any improvement. I have actually taken a downhill turn and lost
the last 3 games. I feel I have reached a plateau and can't get over the
hump so to speak. I am starting to feel burned out and taking some time off.
So my question how do you stay motivated to keep playing? Sincerely, Jerry
Fultz
A: If you feel 'burned out' it's good to take a break, and I've often taken
some time off myself. People play their best when they're 'hungry'.
-----------------------------
Q: I am a 2300 USCF and neither I nor Crafty could find the win for white
in the "position of the week" on the page where I found "Ask the Tiger":
white (to move): Kg1, Qd1, Ra1, Rf1, Be2, Nd4, p: a2, c2, c4, d5, f2, g3,
h2
black: Kc8, Qh3, Rd8, Rg6, Bd7, Nc6, p: a7, b7, c7, e6, f7, f6, h7
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
...Rh6 just looms too large. So, Tiger, I'm asking.
A: White should sac the queen with 1.dxc6 Bxc6 2.Nxc6, e.g. 2...Rxd1 3.Rfxd1
bxc6 4.c5 etc. I'm surprised that Crafty didn't find this.
[Editor's note: this position was given as the
position of the week in the
April 6th, 2003 issue of
The Chessville Weekly. The complete solution given there was:
1.dxc6 Bxc6 1...Rh6 2.cxb7+ Kxb7 3.Nf3 Kc8
4.c5 Bb5 ( Slightly better may be 4...Rg8 5.Rb1 Rg5 6.Rb8+ Kxb8 7.Qxd7 but
the text line is more interesting) 5.Bxb5 Rxd1 6.Rfxd1 Kb7 7.Rab1 Qg4 and
Mr. Fritz says there are at least two different mates-in-eight for White in
this position. Have fun! 2.Nxc6 bxc6 2...Rxd1 3.Rfxd1 b6
( 3...bxc6 4.c5 with mate soon to follow.) 4.Rd8+ Kb7 5.Bf3 Rh6 6.Nb4+ c6
7.Bxc6+ Kc7 8.Rd7+ Kc8 9.Rad1 Qxh2+ 10.Kf1 Qh3+ 11.Bg2 Qh1+ All other moves
lead to a quick(er) mate. 3.c5 See the notes to the
previous variation if you want to know why Black doesn't just take the
Queen. 3...Rd5 4.Ba6+ Kd7 5.Qe2 and White is a piece up.]
-----------------------------
Q: My name is Jeroen. I live in Amsterdam, the Netherlands and I have a
question about learning openings. I know the ideas about the openings I
play, but I often get in inferior positions against stronger opponents in
the opening. I would thus like to learn the techniques to study
concrete lines as I - like most people - have limited time and want to use
that wisely. Thanks in advance for your thoughts. Greetings, Jeroen.
A: I wouldn't recommend trying to study concrete lines at all. It's better
to try and deepen your understanding by studying complete games with notes
by strong players.
-----------------------------
Q: Do you have an opinion on the Urusov Gambit? Is it just too
complicated for over-the-board play? Is it strong enough to stand up to IMs
and GMs? Someone at Chessville suggested you've been looking at it....
Likely you have read Tim Harding's latest installment of the Kibitzer where
he looks at the latest theory:
http://www.chesscafe.com/TIM/kibb.htm and perhaps the website he
reviews: http://www.rci.rutgers.edu/~goeller/urusov.html
Any opinion?
A: I don't really have an opinion but I can offer a simple and practical
antidote. After 1.e4 e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d4 exd4 4.Nf3 I see that Black can, if
he wants, transpose into a Two Knights Defence with 4...Nc6. This is known
to be rather harmless.
-----------------------------
Q: I have decided to study tactics using CT-ART 3.0 and to facilitate the
studies, I have chosen to develop an opening for each side comprised of
Gambits. Could you recommend a solid Gambit opening against 1d4? Matt
Burress
A: I wouldn't be so quick to give away pawns if you want solidity! But the
Chigorin and Gruenfeld Defences may be suitable as they have a high tactical
content.
-----------------------------
Q: My question is in regards to the Grunfeld defense. See, my coach and I
have a difference of opinion in the position that results from: 1.d4
Nf6 2.c4 g6 3.Nc3 d5 4.cxd5 Nxd5 5.e4 Nxc3 6.bxc3 Bg7 7.Bc4 0-0 8.Ne2 c5
9.0-0 Nc6 10.Be3 cxd4 11.cxd4 Bg4 12.f3 Na5 13.Bxf7+ Rxf7 14.fxg4 Rxf1+
15.Kxf1
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
       
There are three moves that I know of from theory:
A) 15. ... Qd6 [ Kasparov's ]
B) 15. ... e5
C) 15. ... Qd7
My coach thinks that C) with the idea of following up with b5 - a6 (or a5) -
Rd8 - and e6 is good for black. However, statistics from www.chessbase.com
show that black is struggling to get a draw...
I believe that A) is by far more dynamic... Statistics are balanced here.
Coach and I think that 15. ... e5 is a bit too premature and stiff...
Question: Which plan is best for black in your expert opinion?
A: I don't have an opinion on this variation, but I'd recommend that you
stand by your own convictions and play it your way. You learn by playing
your own moves and making your own mistakes. Not other peoples....
-----------------------------
- GM Nigel Davies,
Tiger Chess
Ask the Tiger Your
Question Now!
[Index of Ask the Tiger Columns]
|
The
Chessville
Chess Store
Advertisement

Reference
Center
The Chessville
Weekly
The Best Free
Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -
It's Free!!
The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives
Discussion
Forum
Chess Links
Chess Rules
Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store
|