Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

If you have disabled Java for your browser, use the Site Map (linked in the header and footer).

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each.



From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 


Player Spotlight:  GM-Elect Pascal Charbonneau

The US Chess League began on Wednesday, August 31st, 2005.  The inaugural year's champions are the Baltimore Kingfishers, led by the league's first MVP - Canadian GM-Elect Pascal Charbonneau.

The Canadian-born Charbonneau managed to win the Canadian National Championship twice before the age of 20, finishing above experienced Grandmasters such as Alexander Lesiege and Kevin Spragget.  He has competed in numerous Olympiad's for the Canadian national team, multiple World Youth Competitions and has a wealth of chess experience for someone who's so young.

Pascal is no stranger to team competitions, representing UMBC in collegiate championship events and accepting first board responsibilities in US Amateur Team competition.

Don't be fooled by Pascal's 2506 USCF rating, as in serious international competitions he performs stronger than this rating would suggest.  He's been rated by FIDE at or close to 2500 for over two years now.  Charbonneau scored his final GM norm, scoring 6/9 and clear first place at the Winter Chicago FIDE Invitational - January 9-13, 2006.  He did not lose any games along the way.  Charbonneau now qualifies for the International Grandmaster title.

In November 2005 Charbonneau gave an interesting interview to Evan Rosenberg, which can be found at the USCL website Click here to read an interview with Pascal during the Canadian Championship in 2002 (Which he ended up winning!)

Here is Pascal's game against GM Julio Becerra, of the Miami Sharks, during the championship match:

Charbonneau,P (2506) - Becerra,J (2622) [C55]
USCL Finals - Baltimore vs Miami (12), 23.11.2005

1.e4e5 2.Bc4 Nf6 3.d3 Nc6 4.Nf3 Be7 5.Bb3 0-0 6.0-0 d6 7.c3 Na5 8.Bc2 c5 9.Nbd2 Re8 10.a3 Bf8 11.b4 Nc6 12.Re1 h6 13.Bb2 Bd7 14.Nf1 Rc8 15.Ne3 Ng4 16.Nd5 Ne7 17.Nxe7+ Qxe7 18.h3 Nf6 19.d4 exd4 20.cxd4 c4 21.Rc1 g6 22.d5 c3 23.Ba1 Bg7 24.Bb1 Nh5 25.Re3 c2 26.Bxc2 Bxa1 27.Rxa1 Qf6 28.Rb1 Nf4 29.Ba4 b5 30.Bb3 g5 31.Qd2 Ng6 32.Qd4 Qxd4 33.Nxd4 Ne5 34.Ra1 Re7 35.Ree1 Nd3 36.Re3 Ne5 37.f3 Ree8 38.a4 a6 39.axb5 axb5 40.Ra6 Rc1+ 41.Kf2 Rb1 42.Rxd6 h5 43.Rc3 Ra8 44.Nc6 Rb2+ 45.Bc2 Bxc6 46.dxc6 Nc4 47.Rd1 Rc8 48.Rd5 Rxc6 49.Rxg5+ Kf8 50.Rxb5 Ne5 51.Rbc5 Re6 52.b5 h4 53.Ke3 Nd7 54.Rf5 Rg6 55.Rc7 Ke8 56.Bd3 Rgxg2 57.b6 Rb3 58.Rb5 Rgb2 59.Rd5 Nxb6 60.Rd4 Rh2 61.e5 Rxh3 62.Kf4 Rh2 63.Be4 Re2 64.e6 Rxe4+ 65.fxe4 fxe6 66.Rd6 h3 67.Rxe6+ Kd8 68.Rh7 Nc4 69.Rg6 Rf3+ 70.Kxf3 Ne5+ 71.Ke3 Nxg6 72.Rxh3 1-0

Next, Charbonneau annotates his win from week four of the regular season, a fine win against GM Larry Christiansen of the Boston Blitz:

LarryC-BOS (2596) - Charbonneau-BAL (2506) [B70]
ICC 90 30 u Internet Chess Club, 21.09.2005

This was not a perfect game by any means.  But for sure it was exciting, and maybe even worth a couple of lines of explanation.  Let me start off by saying that Larry and I have played quite a lot.  First we played, many years ago, in these so-called Banter games on the World Chess Network.  At the time I was not even an IM, and Larry got the better of it though I won what we could call my 'fair share'.  Later on, WCN organized a match between the American and Canadian champion, and I was out of form and lost a lot of games without a fight.  We have since played countless blitz games on ICC, and it's a pretty tough match.  In any case, I have to say preparing for a game with Larry is the easiest thing I have ever done.  I create a tree in ChessBase, I see he plays every move imaginable, and I'm done.

1.e4 c5 2.Nf3 d6 3.d4 cxd4 4.Nxd4 Nf6 5.Nc3 g6








This is my big surprise.  I have had three games out of 4 with black so far, and they have all reached this position.  OKay, it's still a bit of a surprise because I have played lots of other things too.

6.Be2 Larry avoids the main complications. But that doesn't mean he doesn't want to play it sharp.

6...Bg7 7.0-0 0-0 8.Nb3  I was unfamiliar with this move-order, normally white waits until ...Nc6 (putting pressure on d4 or aiming for a trade) before going this way.

8...a6  An interesting move, I was still considering putting my knight on d7, and the inclusion of a6 a4 can be useful for black in some lines (for example, the main line with Nc6, Be6, white plays f4 and Be3, and black plays ...Na5-c4, well in this line (I hope I'm being clear!!) this favors black.

9.a4 Nc6  I decided to revert to the normal path.








10.Bg5  Only to be slightly surprised by Larry's choice.  Bg5 is a common idea though, white often plays Re1, Bf1, Nd5, and the bishop puts pressure on f6 and e7.

10...b6  Not the only scheme of development but a logical one.

11.f4  Re1, with Bf1 is also possible, but I believe black is OK in that type of position.  This move is more unusual and aggressive.

11...Bb7 12.Bf3  And here I could not decide whether e4-e5 was really threatening or not, and decided that it was not.

12...Rc8 13.Re1  Larry prepares e5 [13.e5 dxe5 14.fxe5 Nd7 15.e6 fxe6 16.Bg4 Rxf1+ 17.Qxf1 Nf8 And I thought black was doing well here (and I still think so).]

13...b5?  This was based on a miscalculation (and trying to be unnecessarily fancy).  [13...Nd7 is the solid move and should be about equal.  White has Nd5 but it does not create much of a threat, and black's position is harmonious enough.]

14.axb5 axb5 15.e5








15...Qb6+  [15...b4 was my original intention, with the idea: 16.exf6 (16.Na4 However, this move ends my fun: 16...dxe5 17.fxe5 Nd7 18.e6 And I am ready to resign here!) 16...exf6 and black is OK.]

16.Kh1 dxe5 17.fxe5 Rfd8








I had decided to sacrifice a piece here, because I thought it was my best practical chance.

18.Qe2 Nxe5  I heard that people thought this was a mouseslip...well, I confess that it wasn't!

19.Bxb7 Qxb7  [19...Neg4 20.h3 offers no hope]

20.Qxe5 b4








Of course I think white should be winning here somehow (how bad was b5!), but the problems to solve are still there.

21.Na5  [21.Qb5 was suggested but is it so clear? 21...Qxb5 22.Nxb5 Rxc2 (22...Rd5 23.Na7 Rxc2 24.Rac1 Rxc1 25.Bxc1 ) 23.Rxe7 Rxb2 And Fritz and the likes like white a lot, but in practice I think you're a bit afraid black might give you problems in something like this.]

21...Qa8! 22.Qxe7?  After this move nothing is clear.

22...bxc3 23.Nb7 Re8!








Maybe Larry missed this idea.  You always want to find ways to fight in team matches, and so I was happy to have this 'trap' and saw it as a way to thank my teammates for having good positions.

24.Rxa8 Rxa8 25.Qxe8+  [25.Bxf6 Rxe7 26.Bxe7 cxb2 With Ra1 could also be what white missed when assessing Qxe7.]

25...Nxe8  I preferred to keep rooks as I thought I could give white problems defending their c-pawns with the rooks on the board. Of course this is a drawn endgame, but Larry felt obliged to try to win as Boston was trailing 2-0.

26.bxc3 Bxc3 27.Rd1 Nc7 28.Nc5 Ne6 29.Nxe6 fxe6 30.g3 Ra5 31.Bh6 Bf6








I love to play this, with dreams of playing g5 and eating the bishop on h6 for a late game snack.

32.Rd6 Kf7 33.Rc6 g5  White is getting in some trouble here.

34.Kg2 Ra8  I am getting closer to the time of my snack.

35.h4 gxh4 36.g4  gxh4 keeps excellent drawing chances, but Larry still had hopes to win.

36...Ra4  with the idea g5 Bxg5








37.c4 g5  was still the best chance. I played this part quite carelessly, as I knew my team would win. On the other hand, I would not take a draw here as I had a riskfree position, it's just kind of hard to play these well, but we all know tiebreaks might matter later on.

37...Ra2+ 38.Kf3 h3 39.Rb6 h2 40.Rb1 Bd4  Threatening to play Bg1

41.Rh1 e5 42.Bg5 Ke6 43.Bh4 Bg1  now the rook is jailed.








44.Bg3 Rc2 45.c5 Kd5 46.g5 e4+ 47.Kf4 e3  this is fine but easier was [47...Bxc5 ]

48.Bxh2 Bxh2+ 49.Kxe3 Kxc5 50.Kd3 Rg2








Now there are technical problems to keep the pawns on the board, although I have had lots of success winning (and losing) R+B vs R.

51.Ke4 Kd6 52.Kf3 Rb2 53.Kg4 Ke6 54.Kh5 Kf7 55.Rd1 Rb7 56.Kh6 Ke6 57.Rf1 Be5 58.g6 hxg6 59.Kxg6 Rg7+ 60.Kh5 Bf6








I think white can still set up a drawn position here but it's not the easiest case.

61.Re1+ Kf7 62.Re4?








This allows a pretty finish, because the rook is badly placed on the fourth.

62...Rg5+ 63.Kh6 Rf5!








And the only way to stop Bg7+ and Rh5 mate is:

64.Rg4 Rf1  White resigns When the rook gets in the way. 0-1

Next season begins later August or early September, 2006.  In March 2006 the League expects to announce who the two new expansion teams are that will join the original eight teams for the 2nd year of the League's existence.  Stay tuned, for further player spotlights, and news as it happens!


Tune in and watch the games live on the Internet Chess Club !!

 

search tips

The
Chessville
Chess Store



Chess
Play free online chess
 

A Chess Book a Mortal can enjoy?

Like Learning a Face-Stomping Opening
over Beer and Onion Rings!

"...perfect opening for non-masters
...many brutal muggings
"
- IM Silman

(Reviews,
Excerpts and Comments Here.)



Reference
Center


The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.