Chessville
...by Chessplayers, for Chessplayers!
Today is


Site Map

Chessville
logo by
ChessPrints

 

 


 


Advertise
with
Chessville!!

Advertise to
thousands
of chess
fans for
as little
as
$25.

Single insert:
$35
x4 insert:
@ $25 each


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store



 


 


From the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

 

 


Smart Questions to Ask, or:
Another Angle of the Grandmaster’s Mind

by
FM Amatzia Avni

A recent review in The Scientific American (August 2006) by Philip E. Ross, described various research results, probing how people become experts in their field.

The article listed several variables: talent, memory, perception, motivation, storage of knowledge and the value of practice.  All very interesting for the general public; but one feels that for the audience of club players, some practical tools would be most welcomed.

When The Grandmaster's Mind (Gambit, 2004) - which I consider to be my best book to date - was published, a reader asked me if I had discovered something really new in the course of the interviews I had conducted with the likes of Gelfand, Smirin and Psakhis.  Indeed, I had, and the most illuminating phenomenon I observed concerns the first question the strongest players asked themselves while encountering a fresh position.

Amatzia Avni is an Israeli psychologist.  He is a FIDE Master in both game and composition, a former editor of the Israeli magazine Schahmat and a regular contributor to Chess Monthly.  His forthcoming book "Devious Chess" will be released by Batsford in April.  Read Chessville reviews of two of his earlier works:  Practical Chess Psychology: Understanding the Human Factor  (2001); and  The Grandmaster's Mind (2004).


As a rule, whenever I screened a position I used to concentrate on my own options.  Sure, I knew about prophylaxis and I did try to fathom my opponent’s plans.  But the grandmasters examine their rival’s moves as their cornerstone, the very first thing they look at.

One interviewee explained to me simply that since in chess both Black’s and White’s plans interweave, it makes no sense to devise a move, let alone a comprehensive plan, without first exploring what the other side intends to do.

Quite convincing, but how many of us act accordingly?  I looked at Purdy’s teaching; he preaches that the first step of thinking consist of asking “what are all the moves I have to consider” and only then, to ask “how has his (my opponent’s) last move changed the position and what are his threats and objectives?”

Grandmasters reverse the order of questions.  This is not a minor difference, as you can verify by looking at the following example:
 

Terpugov - T. Petrosian
Moscow Championship 1951









Black to play

Black is cramped and if you delve into the question “what should he do”, you might think about moves like 15...Ne5 or 15...Nb6, trying to ease the position with an exchange of pieces.  Petrosian senses that White’s attack is gaining momentum.  His next moves are all defensive, aiming to protect his king and the squares near it.

15...Kh8 16.Bf5 Qd8 17.Qg4 Rg8 18.Qh5 Qe8 19.b3 Bf8

There is no way that one would embark on such a sequence by thinking solely about one’s own options!  Only now, feeling safe, does Black pursue his own ambitions.

20.Qe2 g6 21.Bh3 f5 22.f4 Nf6 23.Re1 f:e4 24.B:c8 Q:c8 25.N:e4 N:e4 26.Q:e4 Bg7 27.Rd3 Rb4 28.Qf3 c4  With advantage to Black (0:1, 39).

So, the very first thing Grandmasters examine when they look at a position is their opponents’ options.  Does their approach to other issues differ from that of common players?  I think it does.

Have a look at the next diagram:

L. Szabo - D. Bronstein
Moscow 1956









White to play

26.Rad1 g5 27.Rg1 h5 28.Bb3

The combined moves 26.Rad1 (eyeing the d-file) and 28.Bb3 (vacating the d-file) make room for a concealed threat.  White now intends 29.Nd7! K:d7 30.Q:c5.

Here, an average player would ask “how can I prevent my opponent’s threats?”; a very strong player would probably first pose the question: “Should I bother to parry my opponent’s threats?”

28...g4!

It transpires that there is no need to defend against the threat.  Black simply proceeds with his plans, since 29.Nd7 K:d7 30.Q:c5 loses to 30...Nd5!!, when the double threat 31...d:c5 and 31...Qf3+ decides.

In the game White played 29.Nc4 and lost after 29...R:c4 30.B:c4 Nf3 31.Qb6 Rd8 32.Rg3 Nh3 33.Bf1 h4 34.R:h3? g:h3 35.B:h3 Qf4 36.Qc7+ Ke8 37.Kg2 Ng5 38.R:d6 Qf3+ 39.Kf1 Q:h3+ 40.Ke1 R:d6 0:1.

* * *

Here is another intriguing train of thought: Can my opponent’s move assist me?

 Chapukaitis - Xelezny
Russia 2003









Black to play

16...g5? 17.h:g5 Q:g5 18.Nf4 h4

Black has voluntarily weakened his pawn formation on the king-side, in the hope of creating some play.  White’s refutation is brilliant:

19.B:d5!

Vacating the g2-square for his king.

19...c:d5 20.Kg2

Enabling his rooks to be transferred to the h- and g-files.

20...h:g3 21.Rh1 Qe7 22.Rag1

The opening of files on the king-side has served White, not Black.  22...Bd7 23.Rh3 Qe4+ 24.f3 Q:e3 25.Q:e3 R:e3 26.R:g3  Loss of material is imminent.  26...Kf8 27.R:g7 R:a3 28.Kh2 1:0

Another useful question that ordinary players seldom ask is: “what are the launching pads for future action?”

Adams - Zhang Zhong
Wijk aan Zee 2004









White to play

17.Qc1!

d2 serves as a pivot, a jumping square for White‘s pieces.  Notice how in the subsequent play, White’s pieces, on their journey to their optimal positions, transit through this key square.

17...Nf4 18.B:f4 g:f4 19.Nd2!

19...Bg7 20.Ne4 Be5 21.Rd2!

21...Qd8 22.B:d7 Q:d7 23.h4 Rc7 24.h5 Rac8 25.Rh4 Qf5 26.Rdh2 Re7

He must take measures against 27.Qh1, which can now be met with 27...R8c7.

27.a3 b5 28.Qd2! Rc4 29.Qa5 Qc8 30.Nf6+ B:f6 31.g:f6 Rec7 32.h:g6 f:g6 33.Qe1 Qf8 34.Qe6+ Kh8 35.Rh6 b4 36.a:b4 R:b4 37.R:g6 Rb8 38.f7 R:f7 39.Q:d6 Re7 40.Rf6 Re1+ 41.Ka2 Qe8 42.R:f4 1:0

* * *

Another attribute that distinguishes chess Grandmasters from their lesser brethren is not really a clever question a player poses himself during play, but rather a useful approach, an enduring state of mind.

Constant improving:  “I was amazed during the game.  Each time Petrosian achieved a good position, he managed to maneuver into a better one.”  (R. Fischer, annotating his game vs. T. Petrosian, Portoroz 1958).

There lies one of the big secrets of top players: they are rarely satisfied with what they have but aspire for more.

Lilienthal - Botvinnik
Moscow 1940, 12th USSR ch.









White to play

20.Rac1 Qf7 21.Nf4 Bc8 22.Rc3 Bd7 23.Rfc1

So far White’s moves are easy to find, as the plan to build up pressure against the backward c7 is obvious.

23...h6?! 24.h4 Ra7 25.h5 Ra8

Only in the following moves we can spot the difference in class between a common player and a grandmaster.  The deployment of the white rooks appears to be optimal.  Yet it can be improved!

26.Re3! Kh7 27.R1c3

 









Black to play

Now the invasion of a white rook to e7 is looming:  27...Re8 28.R:e8 with 29.Re3 and 30.Ng6.

27...Rb8 28.Qd3 Ra8 29.Ng6 R:g6 30.h:g6+ K:g6 31.Re6+ Kh7 32.g4

...and White won (1:0, 43)


Inside Avni's Mind

© Amatzia Avni and Chessville


The
Chessville
Chess Store

 

Reference
Center

 

The Chessville
 Weekly
The Best Free

Chess
Newsletter
On the Planet!

Subscribe
Today -

It's Free!!

The
Chessville
Weekly
Archives


Discussion
Forum


Chess Links


Chess Rules


Visit the
Chessville
Chess Store

 

 

This site is best viewed with Java-Enabled MS Internet Explorer 6 and Netscape 6 browsers set at 800x600 screen size.

Copyright 2002-2009 Chessville.com unless otherwise noted.